What makes fraternity parties distinct from other male-dominated partying venues, according to Armstrong?

Fraternity parties are distinct from other male-dominated partying venues primarily because male dominance is organized and endorsed by the university. This structure creates a specific social environment where behaviors and traditions that reinforce masculinity are perpetuated. At these parties, there is often an explicit culture that not only allows but encourages male privilege, aggression, and the objectification of women, creating a unique atmosphere compared to less formal or non-fraternal settings.

This endorsement by the university contributes to a culture that normalizes these dynamics, influencing the behavior of attendees and shaping the overall experience of the parties. The impact of this environment is often a reflection of broader societal norms regarding gender and power, highlighting how institutional support can actively shape social interactions within these settings.

In contrast, other options do not accurately capture the specific qualities that characterize fraternity parties. For instance, they are not regulated by law in a way distinct to fraternity parties, nor do they involve gender-neutral partying as a norm. The claim that they promote healthier social interactions also does not align with the documented issues surrounding consent and the treatment of women at such events.