How do medical-therapeutic practices impact society's sexual norms, according to McGann?

The assertion that medical-therapeutic practices create justifications for restricting certain sexual behaviors aligns with McGann’s argument that such practices often act to normalize specific sexual norms while pathologizing others. By framing certain sexual expressions as disorders or requiring medical intervention, these practices can lead to societal endorsement of restrictive attitudes towards sexuality. This perspective reflects broader societal tendencies to categorize sexual behavior, often reinforcing traditional norms over more varied expressions of sexuality.

Medical-therapeutic practices can create a narrative in which particular sexual behaviors are deemed acceptable or healthy, while others are labeled as deviant or problematic. Consequently, this contributes to a framework that enables regulatory interventions, whether legal, social, or institutional, effectively limiting the scope of sexually normative behavior.

Understanding this dynamic is crucial, as it reveals the power of medical discourse in shaping sexual norms and how it can reinforce prevailing hierarchies related to sexuality in society. In contrast, the other options do not capture the specific way in which McGann discusses the relationship between medical practices and societal sexual norms. Redefining sexual identity, challenging hierarchies, and promoting exploration may occur in various contexts, but the emphasis on justification for restriction is central to understanding McGann's critique of medical interventions in sexuality.